California Agriculture Online
California Agriculture Home  >   Volume 63   >   Number 4  >   Viewing Expanded Abstract

peer-reviewed research article

Can feedstock production for biofuels be sustainable in California?

authors

Stephen Kaffka, UC Davis

publication information

California Agriculture 63(4):202-207. DOI: 10.3733/ca.v063n04p202. October-December 2009.

abstract

The use of crops and crop residues as feedstocks for biofuels increases domestic and global supplies, creates new industries, and may result in reduced greenhouse-gas emissions. Uncertainty about the best crop and residue sources, technologies for manufacture, future public policy, and the global supply and price of oil make it difficult to predict the best approach. California growers can produce feedstocks from grain, oilseed and woody crops and, in the Imperial Valley, from sugar cane. If the technology for making ethanol or other liquid fuels from cellulose becomes cost-effective, then saline and other wastewaters may be used in biofuel feedstock production of salt-tolerant crops, particularly perennial grasses. However, recent global increases in biofuel production have raised questions about their impacts on food and feed prices, climate change and deforestation. New state laws affecting energy use and mandating greenhouse-gas reductions require that the sustainability of all biofuels be assessed. Sustainability should take into account factors at both the global and local scales, including resource-use efficiency, cropping-system adaptability and the potential of biofuels to remediate agriculture's environmental effects.

author affiliations

S. Kaffka is Director, California Biomass Collaborative, and Extension Agronomist, Department of Plant Sciences, UC Davis;

References

Adler PA, del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ. Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Ecol Applicat. 2007. 17(3):91. doi:10.1890/05-2018 [CrossRef]

Alston J, Zilberman D. Seibert J. Science and technology (chapter 11). California Agriculture: Dimensions and Issues. 2003. Davis, CA.:Giannini Foundation. 257p. 87. http://giannini.ucop.edu/CalAgbook.htm.

Bassil ES, Kaffka SR. Response of safflower (Carthamnis tinctorious L.), to saline soils and irrigation. I. Consumptive water use. Agric Water Manage. 2002a. 54:80. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00148-2 [CrossRef]

Bassil ES, Kaffka SR. Response of safflower (Carthamnis tinctorious L.), to saline soils and irrigation. II. Crop response to salinity. Agric Water Manage. 2002b. 54:92. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00144-5 [CrossRef]

Bassil ES, Kaffka SR, Hutmacher RB. Response of safflower (Carthamnis tinctorious L.) to residual soil N following cotton (Gossypium spp.) in rotation in the San Joaquin Valley of California. J Agric Sci. 2002. 138:402. doi:10.1017/S0021859602002204 [CrossRef]

Bazdarich M, Sebasta P. On the economic feasibility of sugar cane-to-ethanol operations in the Imperial Valley. 2001. UCR Forecasting Center, A. Gary Anderson Graduate School of Management and UC Desert Research and Extension Center.

[CARB] California Air Resources Board. AB32 Fact Sheet. 2009a. Sacramento, CA. www.arb.ca.gov/cc/factsheets/ab32factsheet.pdf.

CARB. Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program. 2009b. Sacramento, CA. www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/lcfs.htm (accessed 9/15/09).

CARB. Resolution 09-31. 2009c. Aug. 23, 2009. Sacramento, CA. www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2009/lcfs09/res0931.pdf.

[CEC] California Energy Commission. Development of Regulations for the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program. 2009. Dock No 08-OIR-1. Sacramento, CA.

Cassman KG, Doberman A, Walters DT, Yang H. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Ann Rev Env Resour. 2003. 28:58. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.040202.122858 [CrossRef]

Cleveland CJ. Net energy from oil and gas extraction in the United States. Energy. 2005. 30:82. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2004.05.023 [CrossRef]

Corwin DL, Lesch SM, Oster JD, Kaffka SR. Short-term sustainability of drainage water reuse: Spatio-temporal impact on soil chemical properties. J Env Qual. 2008. 37:24.

de Wit CT. Resource use efficiency in agriculture. Agric Sys. 1992. 40:51. doi:10.1016/0308-521X(92)90018-J [CrossRef]

[EISA] Energy Independence and Security Act. A Summary of Major Provisions. 2007. US Senate, Washington, DC. energy.senate.gov/public/_fles/RL342941.pdf .

Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, et al. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science. 2006. 311:8. doi:10.1126/science.1121416 [CrossRef]

Francis CA, Poincelot RE, Bird GW. Developing and Extending Sustainable Agriculture: A New Social Contract. 2007. New York:Haworth Pr. 367p.

Hammerschlag R. Ethanol's energy return on investment: A survey of the literature: 1990-present. Env Sci Technol. 2006. 40:50. doi:10.1021/es052024h [CrossRef]

Hansen JW. Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agric Sys. 1996. 50:43.

Hermann BG, Blok K, Patel MK. Producing biobased bulk chemicals using industrial biotechnology saves energy and combats climate change. Env Sci Technol. 2007. 41:21. doi:10.1021/es062559q [CrossRef]

Hills FJ, Salisberry R, Ulrich A. Sugarbeet Fertilization. 1982. p.17. Bull 1891. UC DANR, Oakland, CA.

Kaffka SR, Kearney TE. Safflower Production in California. 1998. p.29. UC DANR Spec Pub No 21565. Oakland, CA.

Kaffka SR, Lesch SM, Bali KM, Corwin DL. Site-specific management in salt-affected sugar beet fields using electromagnetic induction. Comp Electronic Agric. 2006. 46:50. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.013 [CrossRef]

Krantz BA, Mackenzie AJ. Response of sugar beets to nitrogen fertilizer in the Imperial Valley, California. 1954. pp.36-41. Vol III, Part 1. In: Proc of Eighth General meeting, ASSBT, Feb. 24-25, Denver, CO.

Liska A, Perrin RK. Land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: Regulations versus science. Biofuel Bioproduct Refining. 2009. 3:28. doi:10.1002/bbb.153 [CrossRef]

Loomis RS. Brickey FE, Broadbent FE, Worker GF. Comparisons of nitrogen source materials for midseason fertilization of beets. Agron J. 1960. 53:101.

Mackenzie AJ, Stockinger KR, Krnatz BA. Growth and nutrient uptake of sugar beets in the Imperial Valley, California. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Tech. 1957. IX(5):7.

Mitchell J. Conservation Tillage Work Group: Current Research Projects. 2009. http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/flelibrary/5334/2290.pdf.

Monteith J. Can sustainability be quantified? Indian J Dryland Agric Res Develop. 1990. 5(1-2):5.

Raguaskas AJ, Williams KK, Davison BH, et al. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science. 2006. 311:9. doi:10.1126/science.1114736 [CrossRef]

Robertson GP, Paul EA, Harwood RR. Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: Contributions of individual gases to radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science. 2000. 289:5. doi:10.1126/science.289.5486.1922 [CrossRef]

[RSB] Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels. The Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels Announces New Governance System. 2009. Lausanne, Switz. http://cgse.epfl.ch/page65660.html.

Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK. Net energy value of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. PNAS. 2008. 105:9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704767105 [CrossRef]

Schoups G, Hopmans JW, Young CA, et al. Sustainability of irrigated agriculture in the San Joaquin Valley, California. PNAS. 2005. 102:6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507723102 [CrossRef]

Sharpouri H, Salassi M, Fairbanks JN. The Economic Feasibility of Ethanol Production from Sugar in the United States. 2006. USDA Office of Energy Policy and New Uses, Washington, DC.

Snyder CS, Bruulsema TW, Jensen TL. Best management practices to minimize greenhouse gas emissions associated with fertilizer use. Better Crop. 2007. 91(4):8.

Stanhill G. Energy and Agriculture. 1985. Berlin, Germ.:Springer-Verlag. 192p.

Stapleton JJ, Banuelos GS. Biomass crops can be used for biological disinfestation and remediation of soils and water. Calif Agric. 2009. 63(1):6. doi:10.3733/ca.v063n01p41 [CrossRef]

Tokgoz S, Elobeid A, Fabriosa J, et al. Emerging biofuels: Outlook of effects on U.S. grain, oilseed, and livestock markets. 2007. Staff Report 07-SR-101. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

Tubiello FN, Soussana J-F, Howden SM. Crop and pasture response to climate change. PNAS. 2007. 104:90. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701728104 [CrossRef]

[UC IPM] UC Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program. Pest Management Guidelines. 2009. www.ipm.ucdavis.edu.

[US DOE] US Department of Energy. Breaking the Biological Barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol: A Joint Research Agenda. 2006. DOE/SC-0095. www.doegenomestolife.org/biofuels.

[US EPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. Regulation of Fuels and Additives: Changes to Renewable Fuel Standard Program; Proposed Rules. 2009. 40 CFR Part 80. Federal Register. May 26, 2009.

van Dam J, Junginger M, Faaij A, et al. Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification. Biomass Energy. 2008. 32:80. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.01.018 [CrossRef]

Wang M, May W, Huo H. Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types. Env Research Letter. 2007. 2:9.

Zah R, Böni H, Gauch M, et al. Life cycle assessment of energy products: Environmental impact assessment of biofuels. 2008. St. Gallen, Switz.:EMPA, Technology and Society Lab.


  • Search Article Text 1946 to Present
Advanced Search